Bill Lind: 4GW is Alive and Well

4GW is Alive and Well

William S. Lind
Special to Slightly East of New

25 May 2013

So “the world simply didn’t develop along the lines it (4GW) proposed”? How do you say that in Syriac?

The basic error in Chet Richards’ piece of April 19, “Is 4GW dead?” is confusing the external and internal worlds. Internally, in the U.S. military and the larger defense and foreign policy establishment, 4GW is dead, as is maneuver warfare and increasingly any connection to the external world. The foreign policy types can only perceive a world of states, in which their job is to promote the Wilsonian nee Jacobin, follies of “democracy” and “universal human rights.” They are in fact, 4GW’s allies, in that their demand for “democracy” undermines states, opening the door for more 4GW.

In most of the world, democracy is not an option. The only real options are tyranny or anarchy, and when you work against tyranny, you are working for anarchy. The ghost of bin Laden sends his heartfelt thanks.

Third Generation doctrine has been abandoned, de facto, if not de jure, by the one service that embraced it, the U.S. Marine Corps. The others never gave it a glance. The U.S. military remains and will remain second generation until it disappears from sheer irrelevance coupled with high cost. That is coming much sooner than any of them think.

In the external world, meanwhile, fourth generation war is triumphing on almost all fronts. Somalia appears at the moment to be a setback. But elsewhere, the forces of stateless disorder (and there are many, not just AQ) have much to celebrate. The bottom line that defines victory or defeat for both states and non-states forces is one question: Is there a real state? A quick tour d’horizon shows spreading state failure. Libya is now effectively stateless, thanks to the “democracy” crowd in Europe and Washington. Fourth generation war is spreading from Libya into west Africa, where states are already largely fictions, Syria is now stateless. The Iraq created by the American invasion was always a Potemkin state, and 4GW there is growing fast, in part fueled from Syria. Fourth generation war is again kicking NATO’s and the U.S.’s butt in Afghanistan, and entirely predictable outcome of invading the Graveyard of Empires. Far more dangerously, 4GW elements grow ever stronger in Pakistan, where the state is failing. Even in Egypt, which has been at least a proto-state for 5,000 years, the state is shaky.

In many of these cases, including Egypt and Pakistan, the only element strong enough to hold the state together is the army. But the “democracy” crowd in Washington immediately threatens aid cut-offs, sanctions, etc., if the army acts. Again, the children now running America’s foreign policy are 4GW’s best allies.

Fourth generation war includes far more than just Islamic “terrorism,” and we see it gaining strength in areas far from the Middle East. Gangs have grown so powerful in Mexico, right on our border, that I predict the state will soon have to make deals with them, as the PRI has done in the past. Invasion by immigrants who do not acculturate is a powerful form of 4GW, more powerful than any terrorism, and that is occurring on a north-south basis (except Australia) literally around the world. Remember, most of the barbarians did not invade the Roman Empire to destroy it. They just wanted to move in. In fact, most were invited in. Sound familiar?

What should concern us most is precisely the disconnect between the internal and external worlds. Externally, 4GW is flourishing, while internally, in the US government and military, it does not exist. This is the kind of chasm into which empires can disappear.

Two quick additional notes:

1) Hammes’s mis-definition of 4GW as merely insurgency as done a lot of damage because it lets the military and the government off the hook. They say, “Oh, OK, we know about that—nothing new here.” That contributes to their refusal to face the reality that the state itself is in crisis.
2) As usual, Fabius Maximus has it right. I would disagree on only one point, where he says “4GW is a tool to produce political change.” In part, for some 4GW elements, that is true. But 4GW is much broader than that. Many 4GW fighters are fighting for goals that have nothing to do with politics, ranging for impressing the local girls to loot to eternal salvation. Fourth generation warfare marks the end of Clausewitz’s definition of war as politics carried out by other means. In many cases, it is simply “supply-side war,” war driven by the large supply of young men with nothing to do but fight.

If the children now running our foreign policy and the mindless ‘droids who head our armed services are ever replaced by serious adults, you will see two changes. First, our foreign policy will reflect the necessity of creating an alliance of all states against non-state, 4GW elements. Second, our armed services will focus on moving from a culture of second generation to that of the third, i.e., from an inward-focused, centralized culture that prizes obedience over initiative to a culture that focuses outward, decentralizes to the greatest degree possible, and above all, rewards initiative. Absent those two very large changes, the ship of state is going over the falls. My advice: Swim to shore while you still can.

William S. Lind is author of the Maneuver Warfare Handbook and director of the American Conservative Center for Public Transportation, where he also writes from time to time on national security issues. Many of his earlier articles (before December 2009)  are archived at DNIPOGO.  The views expressed here are his own.

6 thoughts on “Bill Lind: 4GW is Alive and Well

  1. “The only real options are tyranny or anarchy, and when you work against tyranny, you are working for anarchy.”

    One might ask, soon, if not even now, how far the USA itself maybe from that threshold ?

    “Many 4GW fighters are fighting for goals that have nothing to do with politics, ranging for impressing the local girls to loot to eternal salvation.”

    Bill just aptly characterized the Serbs, Chechnians, and most of the rest, being simply looters like the Somali pirates.

  2. Here’s a thought.
    Domestically and the re-distribution of wealth. By example, Microsoft’s recent initiative to preclude the sharing of its game cartridge software, among those who rightly paid for it.

    Afterall, poor ol’ Bill Gates, has only 60 thousand million dollars socked away, and the great philanthropist donates and re-distributes a fraction as he, and his spouse see fit, and only such.

    One can only pray that Microsoft’s competitors capitalize and thrive on this, rather than follow suit.


  3. Greetings from Shanghai!
    Here i am, with students. Interestingly, the firewall lets BL come through, but I can’t see pictures of boats. Go figure. I arrived here by overnight train from Beijing yesterday, and the train was immaculate and comfortable. I took a sleeper, so the trip lasted about 1 hours for the 1200 km, instead of the usual 5. The schedule runs trains between the two places around every 15 minutes, and they are about 15-20 coaches long. VERY impressive. Some people have said that you might be able to tell the difference between countries from their jails, and there, I believe, though only from hearsay, that Denmark is way ahead of China, but as far as trains are concerned, this place has DK and Sweden beaten hands down.

    The town here is massive and dynamic, and even street people are nice. One feels safe at any time of day or night; maybe it’s just that I haven’t blundered into any areas where the opposite is true.

    Take care.

    Fra: Slightly East of New []
    Sendt: 25. maj 2013 15:10
    Til: Ole Strømgren
    Emne: [New post] Bill Lind: 4GW is Alive and well

    Chet posted: “4GW is Alive and Well William S. Lind Special to Slightly East of New 25 May 2013 So “the world simply didn’t develop along the lines it (4GW) proposed”? How do you say that in Syriac? The basic error in Chet Richards’ piece of April 19, “Is 4G”

  4. The problem with 4GW is not that it is wrong or dead it’s just that it seems so much like Special Warfare as it was originally taught (at least to us older folks), not that there is anything particulary wrong with that (re-branding an idea can be good) but there were people in the 50’s in our military warning of just such an unconventional war situation as we are experiencing today.

  5. I suggest Bill Lind get in touch with Glenn Beck/TheBlaze and have a chat about 4GW because this is what is happening, like it or not.

    [[balance of post deleted because it repeated topics Mr. Livingston had previously addressed.]]

    [[Frank — if you’d like to reach Bill Lind, you can write to him at The American Conservative. — Chet]]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.